Holder in Due CourseHDC
रीतपूर्वकको धारक
A holder who obtained a negotiable instrument for value, in good faith, and before its date of payment, without sufficient reason to believe the transferor's title was defective (NI Act, 2034, Section 2(ण)).
Explained
Conditions under Nepal's Act
- For a bearer instrument: the person who has come to have lawful title to it.
- For an order instrument: the payee or the person to whom it has been endorsed.
- In either case, the holder must have acquired the instrument before its payment date and without sufficient reason to believe that the person from whom it came had no title.
Privileges
- Gets a better title than the transferor: defences such as lack of consideration or defects between earlier parties generally cannot be raised against the holder in due course.
- A holder who takes from a holder in due course gets the same rights (Section 33).
- An instrument obtained unlawfully, or made without consideration, does not create liability between the parties to that act, but this defect does not defeat a later holder in due course (Section 26 read with Section 38).
- Prior parties remain liable to the holder in due course until the instrument is paid.
Why it matters The doctrine is what makes negotiable instruments acceptable in trade: a buyer of a bill can rely on its face without investigating every earlier transaction.
Limit "Not negotiable" crossing on a cheque prevents anyone from obtaining a better title than the transferor (Section 89).
हक दिने व्यक्तिको हकमा त्रुटि छ भन्ने विश्वास गर्ने पर्याप्त कारण नभई, भुक्तानी मिति नपुग्दै मूल्य दिएर हक प्राप्त गरेको विनिमेय अधिकारपत्रको धारक (विनिमेय अधिकारपत्र ऐन, २०३४, दफा २(ण))।
व्याख्या
नेपालको ऐनअनुसार शर्त
- लिई आउनेलाई भुक्तानी हुने अधिकारपत्रमा: कानुनबमोजिम हक प्राप्त गरेको व्यक्ति।
- अह्राएकोलाई भुक्तानी हुने अधिकारपत्रमा: भुक्तानी पाउने वा निजले दरपीठ गरिदिएको व्यक्ति।
- दुवै अवस्थामा भुक्तानी मिति नपुग्दै र हक दिने व्यक्तिको हक नभएको विश्वास गर्ने पर्याप्त कारणबिना प्राप्त गरेको हुनुपर्छ।
विशेषाधिकार
- हक दिनेको भन्दा राम्रो हक: प्रतिफल नभएको वा अघिल्ला पक्षबीचका त्रुटि जस्ता प्रतिरक्षा सामान्यतया रीतपूर्वकको धारकविरुद्ध उठाउन सकिँदैन।
- रीतपूर्वकको धारकबाट हक पाउने धारकको हक पनि उस्तै हुन्छ (दफा ३३)।
- गैरकानुनी रूपमा वा प्रतिफलबिना बनेको अधिकारपत्रले त्यस कामका पक्षबीच दायित्व सिर्जना गर्दैन, तर यो त्रुटिले पछिको रीतपूर्वकको धारकको हक हटाउँदैन (दफा २६ र ३८)।
- भुक्तानी नभएसम्म अघिल्ला पक्ष रीतपूर्वकको धारकप्रति दायी रहन्छन्।
किन महत्त्वपूर्ण यही सिद्धान्तले विनिमेय अधिकारपत्रलाई व्यापारमा विश्वसनीय बनाउँछ: बिल किन्नेले हरेक अघिल्लो कारोबार नखोजी अधिकारपत्रमै भर पर्न सक्छ।
सीमा चेकमा "विनिमेय गर्न नसकिने" रेखाङ्कनले कसैलाई पनि दिनेभन्दा राम्रो हक पाउनबाट रोक्छ (दफा ८९)।
Related
Sources
Updated